This approach aims to review the structurally controlled instability in the general
limit equilibrium method. The fundamental shortage of the finite element technique
that simply used static calculations, and does not include discontinuities in the rock
mass and treating the rock mass as a continuum. This practical application can
overcome the limit of the conventional limit equilibrium method by explicitly
including joints and bedding into this method. Rocks are typically anisotropic, and
the slope in this study is heterogeneous with joints and faults strike parallel to the
orientation in the west wall of Handlebar open pit in Australia. Despite this
difficulty, further technique of anisotropic rock mass strength studied to develop the
possibility of including joints in the rock slope to evaluate the stability by using the
limit equilibrium method LEM. The directional effect of weak structures in a rock
mass is typically defined by comparing the results of two sets of strength analyses
that govern the two primary failure mechanisms. The first scenario is controlled by
two joint sets. The second scenario is controlled by a single dominant bedding plane
dips sub–parallel to the slope and one set of joints. The two scenarios represent
different geological models, and therefore require rock slope stability analysis
methods to determine the critical failure mode. The finding of the analyses shows
that the frictional anisotropy influences the location and the scale of the critical slip
surface. The dip angle of an apparent structure such as a joint, bedding plane, or fault
is often cited as a critical factor controlling the initiation of a rock slope failure
surface. This is because the dip angle determines the relationship between the
discontinuity and the slope face, directly influencing the shear stress and resistance
along the potential failure plane.
Keywords: Slope stability analysis, directional and anisotropic strengths, factor of
safety and the limit equilibrium method
