Purpose: Most studies use VO2 max as a marker for exercise intensity; however, it
is impossible to measure daily. The rising popularity of heart rate monitoring
wearable devices could offer a more accessible way of exercise intensity
monitoring and prescribing activity by healthcare providers. This paper aims to
compare the approach of popular wearable devices to heart rate monitoring and
provide a practical guide on using the readings in individualized exercise
prescriptions. Previous research: Previous studies investigated wearables for
activity prescription and compared the maximum heart rate (MHR) and heart
rate reserve (HRR) markers; however, it was not determined which was superior.
Methods: We analyzed zones proposed by each manufacturer and compared them
with HR ranges cited in research for fat-burning and cardiovascular fitness.
Later, we assessed their usefulness for exercise prescriptions. We compared MHR
and HRR as indicators of exercise intensity using available research. Results: We
found HRR to be a superior indicator of relative exercise intensity because it
allows us to consider an estimated fitness level and the patient's age. The paper
demonstrates an example of converting zones between manufacturers. Based on
the received data, we proposed example prescriptions for patients using
wearable activity trackers. Conclusion: Healthcare providers could benefit from
using wearable devices in prescribing aerobic exercise for patients when
available. While universal MHR-based to HRR-based zone conversion is not
feasible, either can be used. However, HRR-based devices should be preferred
when available.
Keywords: Heart rate reserve, aerobic exercise, fat reduction, obesity,
cardiovascular fitness, smartwatches
