Background: The Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) and other nerve blocks are associated with an increased risk of nerve injury.
Articaine-only infiltrations, which include buccal injections, are recently showing comparable effectiveness to Lidocaine IAN blocks
for mandibular teeth, therefore reducing the need for an IAN block. The study aims to assess Articaine only infiltration (AOBIT)
effectiveness in administering local anaesthesia for monotonous mandibular teeth extractions in adults. Methods: This research
consist 172 patients, both male and female, varying in age from 18 to 75 years. In all 204 mandibular teeth in which 182 excessively
decayed mandibular molars and 22 premolars were extracted. The local anaesthesia was given by a specialist OS and extraction was
done by UG students under the super-vision of consultant. AOBIT effectiveness was assessed in contrast to the necessity for
repeated Articaine infiltrations or rescue IANB with Lidocaine 2%. Results: From the total of 172 patients; 96 (55.8%) were males and
76 (44.2%) were females. Age range was from 18-75 years with the mean of 40 ± 13.7 years. depending only on the AOBIT, sufficient
anaesthesia was obtained in 86.7 % of 172 patients and 204 teeth, In the remaining 13.3% of patients, a ‘rescue' 2% Lidocaine IAN
block is required. Conclusion: For normal adult mandibular tooth extractions, Articaine 4% alone (AOBIT) technique of buccal
infiltration might be a good alternative to Inferior-Alveolar-Nerve-Block with Lidocaine 2%, success rate was remarkable and this
technique could help in reducing nerve injuries due to IAN and lingual nerve blocks.
Keywords: Articaine-Only Buccal Infiltration Technique, IANB, Articaine,
Local Anaesthesia