Medical Science

  • Home

Volume 26, Issue 122, April 2022

Follow up of the health workers’ responses to the preventive obligations amid changing COVID-19 pandemic behavior: A lessons from the crisis

Raouf M Afifi1♦, Ashraf E Saad2, Hassan M Aldossary3, Hani M Alkhalaf3, Bashir Ighile3,4, Mazin YB Elkheer5, Majed Kh Al Harthi6, Fadi HA Althobaiti7, Yousef Afifi1

1Health Research Institute, SA Consultancy and Training, Tampa FL, USA
2Preventive Medicine Department, Armed Forced Hospital, Wadi Al Dawasir, KSA
3General Surgery Departments, Armed Forces Hospital, Wadi Al Dawasir, KSA
4Quality Improvement& Patient Safety Department, Armed Forces Hospital, Wadi Al Dawasir, KSA
5Family and Community Medicine Department, Armed Forces Hospital, Wadi Al Dawasir, KSA
6Academic Affairs, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, KSA
7Medical Records Department, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, KSA

♦Corresponding author
Health Research Institute, SA Consultancy and Training, Tampa FL, USA

ABSTRACT

Background: Despite the emergence of potentially prophylactic vaccines, COVID-19 transmission poses a persistent threat to healthcare providers (HCPs) communities. Aim: Assess the progress in the knowledge and attitudes of HCPs of Armed Forces Hospital Wadi Al Dawasir (AFHWD) toward COVID-19 measures and vaccines perception. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed online, 09-10, 2021, to achieve study aim. SPSS-22.0 software was used for the analysis; ANOVA; t-test used for comparing quantitative variables; χ2 for categorical data; level of materiality set to 0.05. Results: Out of 149 HCPs, 38 (25.5%) were “physician” 44 (29.5%); “nurse”; 31 (20.8%) “allied health” 11 (7.4%)” pharmacist”; 25 (16.8%); “other”’. HCPs averaged 39.3±9.2y of age. Overall score (84.3%) greater than cutoff, set to 70%, also greater than that assessed earlier (69.5%) was achieved (p=0.005). The higher profession the higher score (p<0.05). “Age”; “clinician”; “infection prevention and control (IPC) training; “COVID-19 infection”, were significant score predictors. COVID-19 “all knowledge” (general and IPC, combined) = 79% exceeded cutoff (70%), (p<0.001); also exceeded that identified earlier (69.6%), (p<0.001). The IPC perception score behaved likewise: 86.1% vs. 70%, 86.1% vs. 71.6%, (p<0.001), respectively. An overall vaccine response (68.3%) comparable to cutoff was verified (68.3%), (p=0.08). Most (86.6%) HCPs accepted a COVID-19 vaccine; 73.2% were vaccine confident; 23.3% of those immunized were concomitantly vaccine hesitant (p = 0.012). “Age” and “clinician” predicted vaccine response variability. Conclusion: Findings imply an ongoing improvement of the HCPs’ responses on COVID-19 requirements. Continued education and adherence with updated protocols provide utmost protective environment for the HCP staff against COVID-19 consequences.

Keywords: Healthcare providers, COVID-19, vaccine, response, Central Saudi Arabia

Medical Science, 2022, 26, ms123e2173
PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54905/disssi/v26i122/ms123e2173

Published: 06 April 2022

© Discovery Scientific Society.  All Rights Reserved
Kanyakumari District, Tamilnadu, India