Background: Stigma, originating from ancient practices of physical branding, signifies
rejection, exclusion, or devaluation, arising from expected social judgment. HIV
stigma manifests internally as guilt or shame or externally as discrimination,
impacting individuals' well-being and social interactions. Methodology: This crosssectional
analytical study was conducted at an ART site in Banke District, Nepal,
using quantitative methods. Simple random sampling was applied to determine the
sample size. Ethical approval was obtained from PUIRC. Reliability and validity were
ensured through strategies like pretesting, double entry, and validation. Data were
managed and analyzed using Epi Data and SPSS software, employing descriptive
and inferential statistics to identify significant predictors. Results: The overall HIV
stigma mean score was 2.48 ± 0.21, with scores ranging from 1.84 to 3.42. Among the
four domains, Public Attitude Concern had the highest mean score of 2.60 ± 0.30,
while Enacted Stigma had the lowest. Significant differences were observed between
perceived stigma and factors like age, marital status, residence, employment,
duration of HIV diagnosis, and disclosure status. Additionally, the overall HIV
discrimination mean score was 20.88 ± 2.80. Conclusion: The findings highlight that
Public Attitude Concern is the most significant domain of stigma, emphasizing the
societal judgment faced by individuals living with HIV. Key factors like age, gender,
and HIV disclosure status are strongly associated with stigma and discrimination.
Addressing these factors is essential for reducing stigma and improving the quality of
life for those affected.
Keywords: HIV, Stigma, Discrimination, Banke District
