This study aims to determine the most suitable models among a set of five
candidate models to describe the relationships between diameter height and
diameter volume for individual Shorea robusta trees within the forests of
Putalaibazar Municipality, Syangja. The methodology involved measuring the
diameter at breast height and total height of 137 individual trees and calculating
their respective volumes. The normality of these variables was assessed by a nonparametric
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p ≤ 0.05), which revealed non-normality
and only five nonlinear models were employed to fit the height-diameter and
volume-diameter relationship by a transformation of variables. The study
estimated model parameters, including intercepts and regression coefficients, and
assessed model performance using fit statistics such as the adjusted coefficient of
determination (adj. R²) and root mean square error (RMSE). Statistical
significance of parameters was determined through parametric t-tests for
regression parameters, with all parameters found to be statistically significant (p ≤
0.05). The selection of the best-fitting model was based on models exhibiting the
highest adjusted coefficient of determination, lowest root mean square error, and
lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) value. Visual assessments, including
histogram analyses, normal probability plot curves, and scattered plot diagrams,
were also employed. Among the models tested, the Wykoff model (H(Height,
m)=Bh(Breast Height, m)+exp(3.19+(-9.203)/(D+1)), where D represents diameter
at breast height in cm, demonstrated superior performance for characterizing the
Diameter-Height relationship. For the Diameter-Total Volume relationship, the
model V = (-0.049) + 0.001 * D² proved to be optimal. These selected models are
recommended for predicting the height and volume of individual Shorea robusta
trees. It is essential to note that these models are explicitly site-specific and should
be applied exclusively to sites, sizes, and stand conditions congruent with those
examined in this study.
Keywords: Model, best-fit, RMSE, adjusted R2
