Introduction: Acute pain is a constant reality in clinical practice. Patients come in
because of their pain, surgeons cause it to happen, and a significant part of the care
after surgery involves managing this pain. Yet the medications available for
treatment are pretty much the same as always, including NSAIDs, paracetamol,
local anesthetics, and opioids. There are several limitations when it comes to the use
of opioid drugs, such as sedation, vomiting, or dependence. On the other hand,
suzetrigine is a completely different method, since it uses a different mechanism of
action. It acts on the peripheral part of the pain pathway by blocking sodium
channels. Methods: A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted,
comprising preclinical research and randomized phase II and III clinical trials in the
acute postoperative pain setting for suzetrigine. Results: The NaV1.8 blocker
showed superiority over placebo on the primary endpoint of pain intensity. In
contrast to hydrocodone/acetaminophen, the findings were more varied, with some
evidence of equivalence in particular operational settings but slightly reduced
efficacy in others. Earlier time-to-relief and lower rescue analgesic consumption
were also noted compared to placebo. Adverse events were mostly mild and
transient. The data we have, however, come from short trials. Conclusions:
Suzetrigine has been found to be a good potential candidate for an effective acute
pain treatment, not being an opioid analgesic. Further research is needed to
demonstrate its efficacy across different clinical conditions and patient populations.
Keywords: Suzetrigine; acute pain; NaV1.8; non-opioid analgesics; sodium channel
inhibitors
